Supreme Court of New Jersey· 10/8/1975
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 346 A.2d 66
- 68 N.J. 349
- 1975 N.J. LEXIS 150
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the validity of a consent to search depends on knowledge of the right to refuse consent
- holding that to establish consent as an exception to warrant requirement State must prove occupant had knowledge of right to refuse consent
- holding that essential element of voluntary consent is “knowledge of the right to refuse consent”
- holding under State Constitution the validity of consent search requires knowledge of right to refuse consent
- holding under State Constitution that validity of consent to search depends on knowledge of right to refuse consent
- holding under State Constitution that validity of consent to search depends on knowledge of right to refuse consent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan, Schreiber, Pashmak
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
203 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,197×
- State v. EldersSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2007-07-30· cited 776×
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-03-05· cited 731×
- United States v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1977-05-23· cited 408×
- New Jersey v. PortashSupreme Court· 1979-03-20· cited 393×
- State v. NovembrinoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-01-07· cited 387×
- State v. KoedatichSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-08-03· cited 379×
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals· 1985-11-26· cited 331×
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-08-18· cited 319×
- State v. BruzzeseSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-08-08· cited 310×
- Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1993-08-11· cited 279×
- State v. William L. Witt(074468)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2015-09-24· cited 276×
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-10-21· cited 275×
- State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court· 1982-11-02· cited 274×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-11-19· cited 271×
- Right to Choose v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-08-18· cited 257×
- State of Iowa v. Randall Lee PalsSupreme Court of Iowa· 2011-10-28· cited 252×
- State v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court· 1998-08-27· cited 227×
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-12-10· cited 227×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 3,107×
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court· 1950-02-20· cited 2,080×
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 1,583×
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 1,364×
- Haley v. OhioSupreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 1,069×
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 986×
- Chambers v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1940-02-12· cited 844×
- Payne v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1958-05-19· cited 840×
- Ashcraft v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1944-05-01· cited 693×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-21· cited 560×
- Reck v. PateSupreme Court· 1961-06-12· cited 543×
- Fikes v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1957-01-14· cited 507×
- State v. FloranceOregon Supreme Court· 1974-10-17· cited 128×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.