State v. Cooke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “although a‘merger clause’ may bar one from asserting false oral representations in an action upon a written contract entered into at arm’s length, it does not prevent the state from enforcing a criminal statute enacted for the public’s protection”
• holding that “although a ‘merger clause’ may bar one from asserting false oral representations in an action upon a written contract entered into at arm’s length, it does not prevent the state from enforcing a criminal statute enacted for the public’s protection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McHenry
  Washington Supreme Court· 1977-09-08· cited 78×
• State v. Ray
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1971-06-14· cited 51×
• State v. Bissonette
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1985-02-01· cited 29×
• State v. Zorich
  Washington Supreme Court· 1967-09-07· cited 24×
• State v. Jones
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1964-02-10· cited 11×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-03-06· cited 1×
• Bruce Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-03-06

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Goebel
  Washington Supreme Court· 1950-05-13· cited 183×
• State v. Jeane
  Washington Supreme Court· 1950-01-13· cited 39×
• State v. Willis
  Washington Supreme Court· 1950-10-26· cited 21×
• State v. Ross
  Washington Supreme Court· 1915-04-20· cited 21×
• State v. Myers
  Washington Supreme Court· 1959-01-22· cited 19×
• State v. Goldstein
  Washington Supreme Court· 1961-04-27· cited 14×
• State v. Sedam
  Washington Supreme Court· 1955-05-26· cited 13×
• Haagen v. Landeis
  Washington Supreme Court· 1960-06-02· cited 11×