Skip to main content
· 12/10/2008

State v. Bernabo

Citations

  • 197 P.3d 610
  • 224 Or. App. 379
  • 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that under the county’s policies and procedures, an occupant must be provided the opportunity to remove any valuables before an inventory
  • excluding evidence discovered during an inven- tory search where officers had advised defendant of his right to remove items from the vehicle prior to the towing of the vehicle, but after already searching the vehicle, contrary to local policy
  • statements made after alleged search irrelevant to determination of whether defendant had abandoned constitutionally protected interest in searched property at the time of the search
  • “A defendant who has actual or constructive possession of property immediately before it is searched has a constitutionally protected possessory interest in that property.”
  • sunglasses case left on the ground near a public trash can

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Carson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.