Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/9/2016
State v. Pilgrim
Citations
- 276 Or. App. 747
- 369 P.3d 434
- 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 287
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in order to “relinquish a person’s constitution- ally protect[ed] interests in an object * * * the person must unequivocally manifest an intention to do that”
- “[A] person may relinquish the person’s constitutionally protected interests in an object by communicating to the police through actions or words an intention to relinquish those interests.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Hadlock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 434×
- State v. BridewellOregon Supreme Court· 1988-07-26· cited 131×
- State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court· 2000-03-09· cited 61×
- State v. CookOregon Supreme Court· 2001-10-18· cited 39×
- State v. EdgellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-03-18· cited 9×
- State v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-09-06· cited 8×
- State v. LinvilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-10-22· cited 8×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-26· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.