Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/3/2016
State v. Jones
Citations
- 280 Or. App. 135
- 380 P.3d 1132
- 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 975
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a person’s Article I, section 9, rights are not violated if that person abandons his or her possessory or privacy interests in an item before it is searched
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garrett, Lagesen, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court· 1992-07-02· cited 88×
- State v. CookOregon Supreme Court· 2001-10-18· cited 39×
- State v. BonillaOregon Supreme Court· 2015-12-31· cited 39×
- State v. WillCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-11-23· cited 31×
- State v. StandishCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-01-12· cited 12×
- State v. EdgellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-03-18· cited 9×
- State v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-07-22· cited 9×
- State v. LinvilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-10-22· cited 8×
- State v. McClatcheyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-11-20· cited 7×
- State v. PilgrimCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-09· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.