Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/31/2016

State v. Voyles

Citations

280 Or. App. 579
382 P.3d 583
2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1016

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that, when the state seizes evi- dence in a warrantless search, “the state has the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the search was legal and did not violate Article I, section 9”
discussing a case in which we held that an officer could seize a bag that the defendant had left in a friend’s car, with the friend’s consent, even if the friend lacked authority to consent to a search of the bag, where the officer recognized the bag itself as evidence of a crime
person who boarded horses on another's property did not acquire authority co-equal to property owner's over commonly used portion of premises because property owner had not ceded such authority to boarder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Shorr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.