Washington Supreme Court· 10/7/1999

State v. Clark

Citations

139 Wash. 2d 152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

RAP 2.5(a)(3) analysis required where error affecting confrontation clause rights was raised for the first time on appeal
RAP 2.5(a)(3) analysis required where error affecting confrontation clause right was raised for first time on appeal
“Most importantly, R.G. did not answer, T don’t want to talk about it’ to any of the questions posed on cross-examination.” (first emphasis added)
witness testifies at trial her hearsay statements accusing defendant sexually abused her were lies
witness testifies at trial her hearsay statements accusing defendant sexually abused her were lies
RAP 2.5(a)(3) analysis required where error affecting confrontation clause right was raised for first time on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Sanders

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.