State v. Rohrich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, because child had not testified within meaning of RCW 9A.44.120, trial court abused its discretion by admitting hearsay statements without proof of unavailability and corroborative evidence
• holding that, because child had not testified within meaning of RCW 9A.44.120, trial court abused its discretion by admitting hearsay statements without proof of unavailability and corrobora tive evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rohrich
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-06-19· cited 387×
• State v. Rohrich
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-07-03· cited 83×
• State v. Clark
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-10-07· cited 41×
• State v. Rohrich
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-03-26· cited 3×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-09-28· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. Alaska
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
• Barber v. Page
  Supreme Court· 1968-04-29· cited 1,846×
• Smith v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 763×
• State v. Ryan
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-11-26· cited 344×
• State v. Parris
  Washington Supreme Court· 1982-11-24· cited 142×
• State v. Jones
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-05-04· cited 56×
• State v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 1975-09-25· cited 51×
• State v. Borland
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-02-20· cited 45×
• State v. Rivera
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-05-26· cited 17×