Shaw v. Collins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding not harmless admission of videotaped testimony in violation of Confrontation Clause because testimony “was the linchpin in the State’s case”
• finding relevant the lack of oath in a pre-trial interview of minor declarant found unavailable to testify

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).