Idaho Court of Appeals· 8/19/1993

State v. Clark

Citations

859 P.2d 344
124 Idaho 308
1993 Ida. App. LEXIS 133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

officers did not exceed scope of implied invitation where the officers went to the fi-ont door of the residence at 10:00 p.m. to investigate a neighbor’s complaint about a loud party
officers did not exceed scope of implied invitation where the officers went to the front door of the residence at 10:00 p.m. to investigate a neighbor's complaint about a loud party
“There is an implied invitation for the public to use access routes to the house, such as parking areas, driveways, sidewalks, or pathways to the entry____” (emphasis added)
use of sheer curtains does not create a legitimate expectation of privacy
officers did not exceed scope of implied consent where the officers went to the front door of the residence at 10:00 p.m. to investigate a neighbor’s complaint about a loud party
officers did not exceed scope of implied invitation where the officers went to the front door of the residence at 10:00 p.m. to investigate a neighbor’s complaint about a loud party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lansing, Walters, Perry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.