Michel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[p]ersons visiting the residence for social or commercial purposes” would not construe “no trespassing” signs along driveway “as meant to prohibit their entry”
• holding that four “No Trespassing” signs along three-hundred-yard driveway did not invalidate knock-and-talk
• holding that four “No Trespassing” signs along three-hundred-yard driveway did not invalidate knock-and-talk

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Tennessee v. James Robert Christensen, Jr.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2017-04-07· cited 24×
• Martin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2013-03-29· cited 6×
• Kelley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2015-04-10· cited 5×
• State v. Lohse
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-10-25· cited 1×
• State of Tennessee v. James Robert Christensen, Jr.
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2015-05-14
• State of Minnesota v. Jude Jerome Lague
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-04-15

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cooksey v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1974-07-19· cited 323×
• State v. Clark
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1993-08-19· cited 48×
• Pistro v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-02-16· cited 46×
• State v. Gabbard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-07-13· cited 36×
• State v. Russo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-09-13· cited 28×
• State v. Rigoulot
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1992-07-02· cited 26×
• State v. McIntyre/Pereira
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-10-06· cited 18×
• State v. Gave
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-03-28· cited 14×