Idaho Supreme Court· 8/2/1988
State v. Thompson
Citations
- 760 P.2d 1162
- 114 Idaho 746
- 1988 Ida. LEXIS 85
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Article I, section 17 foreclosed the use of “pen registers,” which were otherwise lawful under the Fourth Amendment
- ruling “in Idaho there is a legitimate and reasonable expectation of privacy in the phone numbers that are dialed”
- holding pen registers unconstitutional under Art. 1, § 17
- Installation of a pen register on defendant's telephone line was a search under the State Constitution
- Installation of a pen register on defendant’s telephone line was a search under the State Constitution
- Idaho Constitution prohibits use of pen registers on citizens’ telephones absent warrant or probable cause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Bakes, Bistline, Huntley, Shepard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-10-27· cited 154×
- State v. GuzmanIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-11-05· cited 152×
- State v. CharboneauIdaho Supreme Court· 1989-04-04· cited 121×
- Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-01-28· cited 104×
- State v. SchafferIdaho Court of Appeals· 1999-06-30· cited 88×
- United States v. Glen Butz Danner L. BooneNinth Circuit· 1993-01-08· cited 71×
- State v. DonatoIdaho Supreme Court· 2001-03-01· cited 67×
- State v. SearcyIdaho Supreme Court· 1990-09-05· cited 64×
- State v. SchultzSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-04-16· cited 63×
- State v. ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 48×
- State v. ClarkIdaho Court of Appeals· 1993-08-19· cited 48×
- State v. GoodwinIdaho Court of Appeals· 1998-04-22· cited 44×
- State v. Leotis B. Branigh, IIIIdaho Court of Appeals· 2013-07-17· cited 39×
- State v. CadaIdaho Court of Appeals· 1996-03-29· cited 39×
- State v. MedleyIdaho Supreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 36×
- State v. McCaugheyIdaho Supreme Court· 1995-09-29· cited 33×
- David Steed & Associates, Inc. v. YoungIdaho Supreme Court· 1988-09-06· cited 32×
- People v. CapolongoNew York Court of Appeals· 1995-02-21· cited 29×
- State v. FeesIdaho Supreme Court· 2004-04-22· cited 29×
- Hoskins v. HowardIdaho Supreme Court· 1998-12-04· cited 27×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 2,614×
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 2,202×
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,923×
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court· 1972-06-19· cited 1,683×
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 1,364×
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1924-05-05· cited 1,214×
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 1,155×
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court· 1977-12-07· cited 871×
- California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court· 1974-04-01· cited 622×
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court· 1986-03-12· cited 142×
- State v. LangIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-11-21· cited 133×
- State v. NewmanIdaho Supreme Court· 1985-01-31· cited 81×
- State v. BottelsonIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-03-20· cited 73×
- State v. YoderIdaho Supreme Court· 1975-04-22· cited 52×
- State v. CowenIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-04-18· cited 47×
- State v. RiceIdaho Court of Appeals· 1985-12-18· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.