State v. Rigoulot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “No Trespassing” signs cannot “reasonably be interpreted to exclude normal, legitimate inquiries” and holding that officers did not violate the Fourth Amendment despite the presence of “No Trespassing” signs
• stating that “No Trespassing” signs cannot “reasonably be interpreted to exclude normal, legitimate inquiries” and holding that officers did not violate the Fourth Amendment despite the presence of “No Trespassing” signs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).