· 6/24/1980
Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Citations
- 613 P.2d 32
- 289 Or. 295
- 1980 Ore. LEXIS 933
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- differentiating between “out-of-pocket loss” and lost wages to survivors of the accident
- in construing a statute, words of common usage are to be given their natural, plain, and obvious meaning
- so concluding regarding the personal injury protection coverage required by statute for motor vehicle insurance policies
- “The obvious purpose of [the PIP scheme] is to provide, promptly and without regard to fault, reimbursement for some out-of-pocket losses resulting from motor vehicle accidents.”
- “The obvious purpose of [the PIP statutes] is to provide, promptly and without regard to fault, reimbursement for some out- of-pocket losses resulting from motor vehicle accidents.”
- “The obvious purpose of [the PIP scheme] is to provide, promptly and without regard to fault, reimbursement for some out-of-pocket losses resulting from motor vehicle accidents.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Denecke, Tongue, Howell, Lent, Peterson, Tanzer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.