Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 7/1/2009

State v. Howard

Citations

682 S.E.2d 42
384 S.C. 212
2009 S.C. App. LEXIS 284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

affirming the trial judge's decision not to recuse himself because \the trial judge had no proper basis to recuse himself and did not abuse his discretion in declining to recuse himself from the trial\
\An issue is deemed abandoned and will not be considered on appeal if the argument is raised in a brief but not supported by authority.\
\An issue is deemed abandoned and will not be considered on appeal if the argument is raised in a brief but not supported by any authority.\
\[A] judge is not disqualified in a criminal action because of an adverse decision in a former case involving entirely different and unrelated criminal charges against the same party.\ (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockemy, Hearn, Pieper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.