State v. Primus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding the matter to the circuit court for a Jackson v. Denno hearing since determination of whether appellant was \in custody\ presents a factual issue
• whether appellant was “in custody” presents a factual issue that cannot be resolved by this Court
• since determination of whether appellant was \in custody\ presents a factual issue, the case was remanded to circuit court for a Jackson v. Denno hearing
• case remanded to lower court to conduct an initial Jackson v. Denno hearing to determine whether the defendant was “in custody” for Miranda purposes when he made statements to a police officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Phillips v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-02-09· cited 71×
• State v. Creech
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-01-31· cited 27×
• State v. Easler
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-05-13· cited 23×
• State v. Cheatham
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-25· cited 21×
• State v. Frey
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-25· cited 5×
• State v. Evans
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-06-12· cited 2×
• State v. Evans
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-01-02· cited 2×
• State v. John Christopher Hart
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-03-02

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Rhode Island v. Innis
  Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
• United States v. Moreland
  Supreme Court· 1922-04-17· cited 76×
• State v. Howard
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-11-14· cited 34×
• State v. Barrs
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-11-11· cited 8×