Skip to main content

State v. Celaya

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 2747

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in granting a motion to suppress. Regardless of whether the defendant's encounter with police was consensual or an investigatory detention, the officer had reasonable articulable suspicion to stop the defendant. However, the search of defendant exceeded the limited consent that defendant gave to the officer to retrieve a knife from his right front pants pocket. Judgment affirmed. (Welbaum, P.J., dissenting.)

Judges: Froelich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.