Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/3/2018
State v. Castillo
Citations
- 186 A.3d 672
- 329 Conn. 311
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that Appellate Court correctly considered, among other factors, defendant’s age in analyzing voluntariness of his statements
- rejecting defendant’s contention that presence of three officers in his living room weighed in favor of concluding that he was in custody
- declining to exercise supervisory authority when facts of defendant’s case did not give rise to purported issue and defendant failed to demonstrate that issue was pervasive problem
- interrogation is less likely to be custodial in relative comfort and familiarity of suspect’s home rather than at police station
- fact that ‘‘only three officers’’ were present supported conclusion that defendant was not in custody (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kahn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. AshbySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-08-06· cited 19×
- State v. HaynesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-07-01· cited 10×
- State v. BrandonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-12-30· cited 9×
- State v. MarsanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2019-08-20· cited 8×
- State v. StephensonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-08-31· cited 7×
- State v. GarrisonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2022-07-19· cited 6×
- State v. BouvierConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-12-07· cited 3×
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-09-30· cited 3×
- State v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-09-02· cited 1×
- State v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court· 2019-07-09
- State of Tennessee v. Joseph MoranCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2020-10-29
- In re D'Andre TConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-11-17
- State v. SaylesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-02-23
- State v. AshbySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-04-27
- State v. BrandonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-01-24
- State v. Connecticut State University Organization of Administrative Faculty, AFSCME, Council 4, Local 2836, AFL-CIOSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-06-04
- State v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-07-26
- State v. McFarland (Concurrence)Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-09-02
- State v. Lazaro C.-D.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-12-09
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 2012-06-25· cited 6,816×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court· 2005-03-01· cited 3,523×
- Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court· 2004-06-01· cited 3,494×
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2010-05-17· cited 3,477×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- J. D. B. v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 563×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 228×
- State v. JanuszewskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-08-19· cited 184×
- United States v. BautistaTenth Circuit· 1998-05-22· cited 139×
- State v. PinderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-24· cited 103×
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-10-17· cited 92×
- State v. LockhartSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-10-12· cited 68×
- Ledbetter v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-09-13· cited 64×
- State v. PittmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-01-17· cited 58×
- Ledbetter v. LantzSupreme Court· 2006-02-21· cited 52×
- State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-04-01· cited 44×
- State v. DesLaurierSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-02· cited 43×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-04-17· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.