Skip to main content
· 11/23/1977

Kudrna v. Comet Corp.

Citations

  • 572 P.2d 183
  • 175 Mont. 29
  • 1977 Mont. LEXIS 811

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘If the court were limited to the arguments and reasoning of counsel in its decisions of cases, to the exclusion of its own observations, many cases would lead us far from what we understand to be the true object of the court.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “If the court were limited to the arguments and reasoning of counsel in its decisions of cases, to the exclusions of its own observations, many cases would lead us far from what we understand to be the true object of the court.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shea, Hatfield, Daly, Harrison, Haswell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.