Skip to main content

State v. Calhoun

Citations

  • 511 A.2d 461
  • 306 Md. 692
  • 1986 Md. LEXIS 265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • successful challenge to the array requires, inter alia, proof that underrepresentation is due to systematic exclusion of the group in the jury selection process
  • “There was no duty on counsel to foresee that we might hold as we held [subsequently concerning admissibility of certain evidence]”
  • “There was no duty on counsel to foresee that we might hold as we held in [future] case[s].”
  • “There was no duty on counsel to foresee that we might hold as we held [subsequently concerning admissibility of certain evidence]”
  • applying waiver principles to common law right of allocution
  • applying waiver principles to common law right of allocution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Smith, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, Couch, Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.