Court of Appeals of Maryland· 10/29/1990

Boyd v. State

Citations

581 A.2d 1
321 Md. 69
1990 Md. LEXIS 169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

summarizing cases holding that a judge’s participation in prior proceedings involving a co-defendant does not require recusal or disqualification
test is whether reasonable person knowing and understanding all the facts would recuse judge
information acquired by trial judge from prior judicial proceedings involving co-defendants is not personal knowledge or bias requiring disqualification
“Participation in prior legal proceedings involving related parties or issues is simply not grounds for a judge to recuse himself’ (citation omitted) (collecting cases holding same)
“ ‘This Court has recently stated that, in the absence of a constitu tional or statutory provision to the contrary, the Judge who presided at the trial of a case which is reversed on appeal and remanded for a new trial is not disqualified to retry the case.’ ”
judges are presumed to be impartial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Adkins, Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.