Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/5/1988
Harris v. State
Citations
- 539 A.2d 637
- 312 Md. 225
- 1988 Md. LEXIS 43
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a jury could consider other sentences imposed on a defendant for offenses related to the capital crime as mitigating circumstances
- holding that a jury could consider other sentences imposed on a defendant for offenses related to the capital crime as mitigating circumstances
- finding that the trial court improperly instructed the jury that it was \to decide the case only on...evidence\
- finding that the trial court improperly instructed the jury that it was “to decide the case only on.. .evidence”
- stating that on remand, the penalty cannot exceed that to which a defendant was sentenced in the original trial
- stating that on remand, the penalty cannot exceed that to which a defendant was sentenced in the original trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adkins, Cole, McAuliffe, Blackwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Zachair, Ltd. v. DriggsD. Maryland· 1997-06-03· cited 234×
- State v. LoftinSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1996-08-08· cited 230×
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-28· cited 176×
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-05-17· cited 137×
- Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-14· cited 116×
- State v. BeySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1992-07-28· cited 115×
- Wiggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-11-08· cited 102×
- Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-12-27· cited 97×
- Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-09-28· cited 96×
- Hunt v. NuthFourth Circuit· 1995-06-27· cited 95×
- Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-10-11· cited 91×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-02-16· cited 84×
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-27· cited 77×
- Borchardt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-13· cited 74×
- Miles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-18· cited 70×
- Booth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-06-24· cited 66×
- Treece v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-11· cited 61×
- Bowie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-09-11· cited 58×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-06-13· cited 53×
- State v. BrobergCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-11· cited 52×
Cites
72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,907×
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 2,751×
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 2,369×
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 2,097×
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,034×
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1977-03-22· cited 1,935×
- Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,501×
- United States v. BallSupreme Court· 1896-05-25· cited 1,376×
- California v. RamosSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 1,071×
- Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1981-05-04· cited 875×
- United States v. TateoSupreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 864×
- Bottoson v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1984-10-01· cited 793×
- California v. TybergSupreme Court· 1986-12-01· cited 383×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.