Skip to main content

Martinez v. State

Citations

  • 522 A.2d 950
  • 309 Md. 124
  • 1987 Md. LEXIS 207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that once a criminal defendant waives the right to a jury trial, “the State may not elect a jury trial”
  • stating that once a criminal defendant waives the right to a jury trial, \the State may not elect a jury trial\
  • iterating that an intelligent and knowing waiver colloquy with the defendant must be conducted on the record in open court
  • ordering a new trial when the record did not indicate that the waiver was voluntary
  • noting that although a trial judge is “not required to ask whether jury trial waivers are the result of threats, promises or inducements,” if the judge decides to ask during a jury trial waiver colloquy, he or she is not “free to ignore the answer”
  • “In determining whether the defendant has knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to a jury trial, the questioner need not recite any fixed incantation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, Couch, McAuliffe, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.