State v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The qualification of a witness as an expert is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.\
• \The qualification of a witness as an expert is within the sound discretion of the [circuit] court and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.\
• \The qualification of a witness as an expert is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Simpson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-01-23· cited 4×
• State v. Andrews
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-07-18· cited 2×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-01-13
• State v. Rose
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-04-11
• Kranchick v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-10-26

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Weston
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-17· cited 263×
• State v. White
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-04-27· cited 85×
• State v. Price
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-04-17· cited 63×
• State v. Patterson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 51×
• State v. Caldwell
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-10-22· cited 20×
• State v. Goode
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-07-08· cited 13×
• State v. Dantonio
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-01-16· cited 7×
• State v. Priester
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-01-22· cited 5×