Brown v. LA FRANCE IND., a DIV. OF RIEGEL TEX.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in a workers' compensation case that the single commissioner did not err in reopening a case for additional testimony from the claimants and noting the employer \was expressly authorized to present rebuttal testimony and failed to do so\
• when the claimant in a workers’ compensation case inadvertently omits proof of causation, the case should be reopened and an opportunity should be afforded the claimant to supply such proof in the interest of justice
• a trial judge enjoys considerable latitude and discretion in deciding whether to allow a party to reopen his case and this decision will not be disturbed unless the opposing party was prejudiced thereby

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).