Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/23/1997
State v. Gulledge
Citations
- 487 S.E.2d 590
- 326 S.C. 220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing \the [circuit] court may consider information which may be inadmissible under evidentiary rules\ during a restitution hearing because \[a] restitution hearing is part of the sentencing proceeding\
- finding no discovery violation where the evidence was in the possession of a third party corporation and thus not within the possession, custody or control of the prosecution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: III, Burnett, Finney, Toal, Moore, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Humphries v. OzmintFourth Circuit· 2005-02-04· cited 64×
- State v. KennerlyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-06-15· cited 58×
- State v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-07-21· cited 17×
- Humphries v. OzmintFourth Circuit· 2004-05-03· cited 13×
- In Re Delric H.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-27· cited 11×
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-07-20· cited 5×
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-07-12· cited 2×
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-05-11· cited 2×
- State v. HuttoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-11-17· cited 1×
- State v. QuinnSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-05-06
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
- United States v. Ira Silverman (90-3205) Morris G. Woodard (90-5816) and Gary Caton (90-5733/91-6506)Sixth Circuit· 1992-09-22· cited 254×
- State v. NanceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-01-08· cited 72×
- Strachan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-03-22· cited 64×
- Anglian v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1986-10-06· cited 56×
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-07-21· cited 40×
- United States v. Robert Holmes (91-3735), Daniel Ross (91-3774)Sixth Circuit· 1992-04-13· cited 38×
- United States v. Wayne Randell AnglianSixth Circuit· 1986-03-05· cited 35×
- State v. GarnerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-04-08· cited 21×
- State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-10-22· cited 20×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-01-27· cited 18×
- Herrera v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 16×
- State v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-11-30· cited 14×
- Zemp Const. Co. v. HARMON BROS. CONST. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1954-06-02· cited 9×
- State v. GulledgeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-03-04· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.