United States v. John A. Tegzes, Susan Langston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a “highly speculative” argument that prospective jurors had been biased and noting that “mere awareness that other jurors have prejudices does not disqualify those jurors who heard about those prejudices”
• “the spectre of bias or prejudice created by [a] jurors’ remarks is too speculative and conjectural to overcome the general presumption in favor of jury impartiality” where the statement did not show a “predisposition toward the prosecution or accused”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).