State v. Money

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jury resolves witness credibility
• in-person lineup not unduly suggestive despite minor differences as to height, weight, and hair length and where only defendant had a mustache
• supreme court independently evaluated “ ‘totality of the circumstances’ surrounding the identification procedure to determine whether the lineup was unduly suggestive,” concluding it was not
• in-person lineup not unduly suggestive despite minor differences in height, weight and hair length, and where only defendant had a mustache
• supreme court independently evaluated “‘totality of the circumstances’ surrounding the identification procedure to determine whether the lineup was unduly suggestive,” concluding it was not
• police officer’s informing victims they had chosen from live lineup “the owner of the car which had been used by their three assailants” might have made them more certain of their identifications but did not unfairly taint their in-court identifications

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).