Court of Appeals of Arizona· 9/30/1976
State v. Salazar
Citations
- 557 P.2d 552
- 27 Ariz. App. 620
- 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 679
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that expert testimony describing the common counter-surveillance techniques of narcotics dealers was admissible
- holding admissible expert testimony concerning counter-surveillance techniques commonly used by narcotics dealers, specifically including practice of using vehicle to observe in advance area where distribution was intended to occur
- holding admissible expert testimony describing the common counter-surveillance techniques used by narcotics dealers in a case where four co-defendants were charged with conspiracy to sell and transport heroin
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Krucker, Hathaway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ArredondoArizona Supreme Court· 1987-12-03· cited 115×
- State v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-05-04· cited 105×
- State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court· 1980-04-21· cited 92×
- State v. MosleyArizona Supreme Court· 1978-06-27· cited 76×
- State v. EmeryArizona Supreme Court· 1982-02-16· cited 51×
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court· 1982-03-26· cited 47×
- State v. OldakerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 36×
- State v. CaldwellArizona Supreme Court· 1977-12-21· cited 22×
- State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-06-12· cited 15×
- State v. NightwineCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-06-17· cited 12×
- McLaughlin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1981-04-01· cited 7×
- State v. CummingsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-07-17· cited 6×
- State v. SwartzCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-06-19· cited 5×
- State v. EscalanteCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-06-11· cited 2×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-10-05· cited 153×
- Marino v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1937-07-28· cited 151×
- People v. ClayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-05-07· cited 41×
- State v. KeenerArizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-03· cited 35×
- Pattis v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1927-02-21· cited 24×
- State v. BradyArizona Supreme Court· 1948-01-26· cited 21×
- State v. EstradaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-06-16· cited 18×
- Raymond O. Jones v. United States of America, Harold Ben Marley v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1966-08-26· cited 16×
- Thomas v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1932-04-11· cited 16×
- State v. WarnessCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-04-22· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.