Skip to main content

State v. Salazar

Citations

  • 557 P.2d 552
  • 27 Ariz. App. 620
  • 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that expert testimony describing the common counter-surveillance techniques of narcotics dealers was admissible
  • holding admissible expert testimony concerning counter-surveillance techniques commonly used by narcotics dealers, specifically including practice of using vehicle to observe in advance area where distribution was intended to occur
  • holding admissible expert testimony describing the common counter-surveillance techniques used by narcotics dealers in a case where four co-defendants were charged with conspiracy to sell and transport heroin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Krucker, Hathaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.