Skip to main content

State v. Brown

Citations

  • 154 N.E.3d 1129
  • 2020 Ohio 3614

Syllabus

The trial court did not commit plain error by allowing the admission of the victim's out-of-court statements as substantive evidence. The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant's Crim.R. 29 motion. Defendant-appellant's conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Defendant-appellant failed to demonstrate that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court erred by not calculating the number of days of jail-time credit, if any, to which defendant-appellant might be entitled.

Judges: Preston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.