Skip to main content

State v. Brown

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 274

Syllabus

Motion for leave; motion for new trial; exculpatory evidence; newly discovered evidence; unavoidably prevented; public records request. - Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant leave to move for a new trial or denying his petition for postconviction relief because appellant failed to demonstrate that (1) he was unavoidably prevented from discovering the evidence he relied on it support of his motion; (2) how the supporting documentation qualified as Brady material; and (3) the State suppressed the evidence supporting his motion. Appellant failed to demonstrate that he complied with R.C. 149.43 in his attempt to obtain public records to support his \unavoidably prevented\ burden.

Judges: Keough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.