Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 9/22/2021

Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)

Citations

  • 187 N.E.3d 463
  • 166 Ohio St. 3d 427
  • 2021 Ohio 3304

Syllabus

Evid.R. 601—Expert testimony in medical-malpractice case—A physician employed in an executive position who does not directly oversee physicians who treat patients does not satisfy the active-clinical-practice requirement of Evid.R. 601.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An abuse of discretion occurs when a decision is unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fischer, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

623 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.