Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Ohio Supreme Court· 5/3/1967

State v. Perry

Citations

  • 10 Ohio St. 2d 175
  • 39 Ohio Op. 2d 189
  • 226 N.E.2d 104
  • 1967 Ohio LEXIS 387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that issues that could be litigated on direct appeal could not be litigated in state post-conviction relief
  • holding that claims must be raised on direct appeal, if possible, or they will be barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
  • holding that a party is precluded from raising a claim that he failed to raise during the course of his direct appeal
  • holding that res judicata bars a criminal defendant from raising in post-conviction proceedings those claims that could have been raised on direct appeal
  • concluding that because the defendant could have, but did not, raise a claimed sentencing error on direct appeal, the error was now barred by the doctrine of res judicata
  • holding that any claim that was raised or could have been raised on direct appeal is barred from review on post conviction under the doctrine of res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,300 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Perry

440 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.