Ohio Supreme Court· 9/28/1994
State v. Steffen
Citations
- 70 Ohio St. 3d 399
- 639 N.E.2d 67
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that res judicata applies to actions for posteonviction relief
- explaining that res judicata applies to actions for postconviction relief
- interpreting Section 2(B)(1)(f) “to authorize judgments in this court that are necessary to achieve closure and complete relief in actions pending before the court”
- explaining that res judicata applies to actions for postconviction relief
- “ ‘courts possess all powers necessary to secure and safeguard the free and untrammeled exercise of their judicial functions’ ”
- “[p]ostconviction review is a narrow remedy, since res judicata bars any claim that was or could have been raised at trial or on direct appeal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
278 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
- State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-26· cited 691×
- State v. BeyOhio Supreme Court· 1999-05-19· cited 451×
- State v. Williams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-11-10· cited 230×
- State v. Belton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-04-20· cited 156×
- Alisha Ann Murphy v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2014-02-25· cited 75×
- State v. Broom (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-16· cited 55×
- State v. WidmerOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-14· cited 54×
- State ex rel. Lipinski v. Cuyahoga County Common Pleas CourtOhio Supreme Court· 1995-11-01· cited 53×
- State v. Noling (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-21· cited 52×
- Burger v. City of Cleveland HeightsOhio Supreme Court· 1999-11-17· cited 51×
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2010-03-26· cited 38×
- Jamison v. CollinsS.D. Ohio· 2000-05-10· cited 37×
- State ex rel. Ware v. Giavasis (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-01· cited 36×
- Bejarano v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court· 1996-12-20· cited 33×
- State v. BerryOhio Supreme Court· 1997-12-03· cited 31×
- State v. NewtonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-01-25· cited 31×
- State ex rel. Buck v. MaloneyOhio Supreme Court· 2004-06-09· cited 30×
- State ex rel. Parker Bey v. Byrd (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 29×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 3,807×
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court· 1991-04-16· cited 3,331×
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court· 1967-07-19· cited 1,186×
- Murray v. GiarratanoSupreme Court· 1989-06-23· cited 547×
- State v. SingerOhio Supreme Court· 1977-05-18· cited 275×
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court· 1980-02-20· cited 160×
- State v. CrowderOhio Supreme Court· 1991-06-12· cited 121×
- State v. DulingOhio Supreme Court· 1970-01-07· cited 89×
- State ex rel. Foster v. WittenbergOhio Supreme Court· 1968-12-24· cited 39×
- Coleman v. McGettrickOhio Supreme Court· 1965-05-19· cited 33×
- Commercial Savings Bank v. Wyandot County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 26×
- State ex rel. Polcyn v. BurkhartOhio Supreme Court· 1973-02-08· cited 24×
- State ex rel. Owens v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court· 1971-07-21· cited 15×
- In re Furnishings & Equipment for the Judge, Courtroom & Personnel for Courtroom TwoOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.