Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 9/28/1994

State v. Steffen

Citations

  • 70 Ohio St. 3d 399
  • 639 N.E.2d 67

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that res judicata applies to actions for posteonviction relief
  • explaining that res judicata applies to actions for postconviction relief
  • interpreting Section 2(B)(1)(f) “to authorize judgments in this court that are necessary to achieve closure and complete relief in actions pending before the court”
  • explaining that res judicata applies to actions for postconviction relief
  • “ ‘courts possess all powers necessary to secure and safeguard the free and untrammeled exercise of their judicial functions’ ”
  • “[p]ostconviction review is a narrow remedy, since res judicata bars any claim that was or could have been raised at trial or on direct appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

278 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.