Supreme Court of Connecticut· 9/16/2008
State v. Foreman
Citations
- 954 A.2d 135
- 288 Conn. 684
- 2008 Conn. LEXIS 353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that state met foundational standards, despite expert wit- nesses’ lack of knowledge regarding proprietary infor- mation
- validity of purported waiver is question of fact that depends on circumstances of particular case
- validity of purported waiver is question of fact that depends on circumstances of particular case
- ‘‘[w]here a state rule is similar to a federal rule we review the federal case law to assist our interpretation of our rule’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- buccal swab legally obtained in one case used in investigation of second case; consent to search not rendered involuntary because police did not tell defendant purpose of underlying search
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Schaller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 242×
- Klein v. Norwalk HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-12-21· cited 33×
- Rowe v. Superior Court, Judicial District of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-12-09· cited 32×
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-06· cited 29×
- State v. TOMAS D.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-01· cited 25×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-01· cited 25×
- State v. WallaceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-02-03· cited 24×
- State v. Manuel T.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-11-19· cited 22×
- State v. DabateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-03-11· cited 15×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-12-21· cited 14×
- State v. VasquezConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-02-28· cited 7×
- In Re Earl B.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-05-18· cited 5×
- State v. BenefieldConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-11-18
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2022-01-04
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 1,070×
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-18· cited 496×
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-20· cited 268×
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-03· cited 248×
- Campfield v. Stickman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at GreeneSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 186×
- State v. SivriSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-23· cited 184×
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-07· cited 167×
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-02-02· cited 138×
- Choice v. GoordSupreme Court· 2000-10-02· cited 119×
- State v. FabricatoreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-02-27· cited 91×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-15· cited 90×
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-11-13· cited 88×
- State v. CanalesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-03-13· cited 82×
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-07-30· cited 81×
- United States v. LauderTenth Circuit· 2005-06-08· cited 80×
- American Oil Co. v. ValentiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-12-18· cited 69×
- State v. BurgeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-02-12· cited 67×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.