Skip to main content

State v. Brice

Citations

  • 186 Conn. 449
  • 442 A.2d 906
  • 1982 Conn. LEXIS 469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assigning error to trial court’s evidentiary ruling on basis of objection not preserved at trial amounts to ambuscade of trial judge
  • no corroboration required, admissible to show constancy in complainant’s declarations
  • no corroboration required, admissible to show constancy in complainant's declarations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arthur, Speziale, Peters, Healey, Parskey, Armentano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Brice

27 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.