Skip to main content

State v. Adams

Citations

  • 225 Conn. 270
  • 623 A.2d 42
  • 1993 Conn. LEXIS 94

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because consciousness of guilt instruction allowed permissive inference, claim that instruction unconstitutionally diluted state’s burden of proof had no merit
  • because consciousness of guilt instruction allowed permissive inference, it did not implicate constitutional right and, thus, claim that instruction unconstitutionally diluted state’s burden of proof had no merit
  • unpreserved insufficiency of evidence claims implicate due process rights and are reviewable on appeal
  • “ ‘[a] reasonable doubt is a doubt for which a valid reason can be assigned’ and ‘is such a doubt as in serious affairs which concern yourselves you would . . . heed’ ”
  • ‘a doubt for which a valid reason can be assigned’
  • reasonable doubt is doubt for which valid reason can be assigned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berdon, Norcott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

118 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.