DeLuca v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that contract that men- tioned only limited agent and not seller failed to satisfy statute of frauds
• holding that contract that mentioned only agent and not seller failed to satisfy statute of frauds
• “[s]ince the memoranda did not contain the name of the seller there was no compliance with the statute of frauds”
• \[a] person's intention in any regard is to be inferred from his conduct ... and ordinarily can be proven only by circumstantial evidence\ [citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted]
• private landowner has burden to prove by clear and convincing evidence that developer who began, but did not complete, negotiations to use landowner’s property as a source for landfill material fraudulently led landowner to believe contract was completed
• using term “intentional misrepresentation” to characterize fraud claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).