Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/12/2003

State v. Brice

Citations

80 P.3d 1113
276 Kan. 758
2003 Kan. LEXIS 698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding it was error to instruct the jury that the term “great bodily harm” means a “through and through bullet wound”
disapproving of its prior statement that a through and through bullet wound constitutes great bodily harm as a matter of law
disapproving statement that through and through bullet wound is great bodily harm as a matter of law
finding an instruction, stating that \the term Great Bodily Harm means a 'through and through bullet wound'\ which essentially told the jury that the State had established an essential element of aggravated battery, invaded the province of the jury
finding an instruction invaded the province of the jury by stating \'the term Great Bodily Harm means a \through and through bullet wound\'\ because it told the jury that the State had established an essential element of aggravated battery
no obligation to instruct on lesser included offenses arises unless offense supported by enough evidence to reach jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allegrucci, Gernon, Beier, Brazil, Bennington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.