Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/17/1998

State v. Bishop

Citations

957 P.2d 369
264 Kan. 717
1998 Kan. LEXIS 98

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an interpreter is not required to inform a deaf driver of the implied consent law’s consequences and listing cases in other states reaching the same conclusion
holding that an interpreter is not required to inform a deaf driver of the implied consent law's consequences and listing cases in other states reaching the same conclusion
holding notice sufficient even though officer read advisory aloud, knowing licensee was deaf
finding defendant could not prove district court committed reversible error in admitting document that was not an original because defendant had not included document in record
neither requesting a defendant to take a breath test nor the administration of an actual breath test amounts to an interrogation
monthly certification of Intoxilyzer 5000 breath test machine and certification of calibration solution official records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abbott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.