Supreme Court of Kansas· 3/6/1998

State v. Gardner

Citations

955 P.2d 1199
264 Kan. 95
1998 Kan. LEXIS 64

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an issue not presented to the trial court will not be considered on appeal
concluding that improper closing remark regarding the location of key evidence was harmless error because the misstatement was made in passing and was not a significant part of the State’s case
concluding that improper closing remark regarding the location of key evidence was harmless error because the misstatement was made in passing and was not a significant part of the State’s case
concluding that an improper closing remark regarding the location of key evidence was harmless error because the misstatement was made in passing and was not a significant part of the State's case
concluding improper closing remark regarding the location of key evidence was harmless because it was made in passing and not an important piece of the State's case
collateral attack prohibited where the notice of appeal did not identify the rulings appealed from as being from prior proceedings, separate from the revocation hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abbott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.