State v. Boley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that there was no violation of a plea agreement by defendant who challenged legality of his sentence when that defendant had not waived his ability to challenge the sentence as part of his plea agreement
• holding in a direct appeal, upon remand for resentencing pursuant to State v. McAdam , 277 Kan. 136 , 83 P.3d 161 [2004], the State was not released from its obligations to abide by plea agreement under the frustration of purpose doctrine
• applying fundamental contract principles to plea agreements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).