Supreme Court of Iowa· 12/22/1993

State v. Howard

Citations

509 N.W.2d 764
1993 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 279
1993 WL 527360

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the confrontation and 9 foundation grounds for the objection were not sufficiently specific to inform the trial court of the hearsay basis urged on appeal
holding that an objection before the introduction of evidence must be repeated when the evidence is introduced or objections to the error in admitting the evidence are waived
holding that the grounds for the objection were not sufficiently specific to inform the trial court of the hearsay basis urged on appeal and as a result the defendant did not preserve error on his hearsay claim
noting the use of a consent to search form similar to the one Hogan signed, and holding such consent was voluntary
noting the use of a consent to search form similar to the one Hogan signed, and holding such consent was voluntary
stating a hearsay objection is not specific enough to raise the issue of the constitutional right to confrontation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Larson, Carter, Snell, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.