Dykstra v. Iowa District Court for Jones County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Iowa Department of Corrections has “broad 9 discretion” to determine participation in the sex offender treatment program
• acknowledging that “[c]ourts have held that inmates currently serving sentences for sex offenses are not entitled to any additional procedures prior to being classified as required to participate in SOTP”
• acknowledging that “[c]ourts have held that inmates currently serving sentences for sex offenses are not entitled to any additional procedures prior to being classified as required to participate in SOTP”
• noting Iowa Supreme Court exercises supervisory authority to prohibit use of unstipulated exams in Iowa courts
• noting Iowa Code section 903A.4 states the director of the department of corrections is to develop policies and rules to implement programming for inmates and the department has “broad discretion” to determine participation in the sex offender treatment program
• “Generally, a person has a constitutional due process right to an evidentiary hearing in accordance with contested case procedures....” (Emphasis added.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).