Skip to main content

State v. Blair

Citations

  • 347 N.W.2d 416
  • 1984 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “a defendant’s inconsistent statements are probative circumstantial evidence from which the jury may infer guilt”
  • holding “a defendant’s inconsistent statements are probative circumstantial evidence from which the jury 14 may infer guilt”
  • stating the “very function of the jury is to sort out the evidence presented and place credibility where it belongs”
  • finding a defendant’s inconsistent statements are probative circumstantial evidence from which a jury may infer guilt
  • finding defendant’s inconsistent statements were probative circumstantial evidence from which a jury may infer guilt
  • finding a defendant’s inconsistent statements are probative circumstantial evidence from which a jury may infer guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Mecormick, McGiverin, Schultz, Wolle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

116 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.