Skip to main content

State v. Flores

Citations

  • 685 P.2d 999
  • 68 Or. App. 617
  • 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing uncertain precedential value under Article I, section 9, of Oregon decisions applying Fourth Amendment analysis
  • independent analysis of Article I, section 9, can lead to less protection against search and seizure than provided by Fourth Amendment
  • “[W]hen an arrest is for possession of contraband, a search of the person and the area within the immediate control of the person for evidence of that offense — including the opening of closed containers — is permissible”
  • and in the dissent here of Van Hoomissen, J.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette, Buttler, Young, Joseph, Newman, Lowry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.