State v. Wamala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting impeachment of two witnesses because their testimony also contained evidence that was relevant and instrumental to State’s case
• “The fact that the door has been opened does not, by itself, permit all evidence to pass through.” (quotation omitted)
• court decides constitutional questions only when necessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).