Irving Polcover v. Secretary of the Treasury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the “[d]uplication, delay, expense and despair for the employee-litigant [which is] inherent in such a [double reviewing court] system”; interposition of District Court serves “no viable purpose”
• tests are framed in terms of “rational basis,” “arbitrary and capricious” and “substantial evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).