Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/5/2012

State v. Beckham

Citations

253 Or. App. 609
292 P.3d 611
2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

accepting the state’s concession that the trial court erred in entering a supplemental judgment for restitution after 90 days of the original judgment
review of misdemeanor sentences is governed by ORS 138.040, whereas review of felony sentences is governed by ORS 138.222
preservation principles were inapposite when “nothing in the record indicates that defendant had notice of, or a prior opportunity to object to, the trial court’s restitution ruling before the court entered the supplemental judgment”
preservation principles were inapposite when “nothing in the record indicate [d] that defendant had notice of, or a prior opportunity to object to, the trial court’s restitution ruling before the court entered the supplemental judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Duncan, Haselton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.