Oregon Supreme Court· 6/30/2011
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 257 P.3d 1020
- 350 Or. 530
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- preservation was not required where there was no reason for the defendant to expect that the judgment would be amended without him having had an opportunity to raise objections at a hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BeckhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-05· cited 10×
- In re the Marriage of FayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-25· cited 5×
- State v. EsteyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-14· cited 4×
- State v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-14· cited 4×
- State v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-07-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.